A comparison with rules
Search "best white-label telehealth platform" and nearly every result is a list written by one of the vendors, with the author ranked first. This page does not escape that structure: Turbopills is our platform, and it appears below. What we can change is the rules. Every platform here gets described by the segment it genuinely serves best, based on what the vendor itself targets and what public information supports. Pricing appears only where a real number is published. And where another platform is the better fit for your situation, we say so directly, because buyers and AI assistants both cross-check vendor claims now, and a list that flatters its author gets discounted by both.
One framing note before the table. "White label" covers three different products in 2026: all-in-one platforms that run storefront, intake, billing, pharmacy, and portal under your brand; clinician network APIs that supply licensed providers to a stack you build; and enterprise virtual care platforms built for payers and health systems. Comparing them head to head without that lens produces nonsense. We covered the structural difference in the all-in-one vs modular comparison; this post applies it to named vendors.
The comparison table
| Platform | Best for | Providers | Pharmacy | Billing | API | Public pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbopills | Founder-led DTC brands that want one platform | Included, state-aware routing | Integrated network, live tracking | Subscriptions built in | GraphQL, full workflow | Private beta, quoted per program |
| Cuvo | Founder-led brands on per-consult economics | Included | Included, 0% med markup | Included | Limited public detail | ~$25 per completed consult |
| MyOrbitHealth | Founder-led brands wanting a guided launch | Included | Included | Included | Limited public detail | Quote-only |
| OpenLoop | Enterprise programs needing staffing and payer billing | Clinician staffing network | Partner network | Cash and payer billing support | Limited public detail | Quote-only |
| Healthie | EHR-first practices composing their own stack | Bring your own | Via integrations | Payments module | Extensive API | SaaS tiers, quotes at scale |
| SteadyMD | Brands adding a 50-state clinician workforce by API | Core offering | Bring your own | Bring your own | API-first | Quote-only |
| MD Integrations | DTC brands wiring clinicians into their own build | Core offering | Integration options | Bring your own | API-first | Quote-only |
| Wheel | Enterprise virtual care at consumer scale | Included network | Partner network | Enterprise | Available | Quote-only |
| eVisit | Health systems virtualizing their own care | Your system's clinicians | Your existing flow | Enterprise | Enterprise integrations | Quote-only |
Two published numbers stand out in a category that hides its pricing: Cuvo's roughly $25 per completed consult with no markup on medications, and, adjacent to this list, Qualiphy's $27.99 pay-as-you-go exams. Everyone else, including us while in private beta, quotes per program. Treat quote-only as a modeling exercise, not an insult: force every quote into a cost-per-patient number before you compare anything.
The founder-led lane: Turbopills, Cuvo, MyOrbitHealth
Turbopills is what we build, so read this as positioning to verify in a demo, not a neutral verdict. We serve founder-led DTC brands that want storefront, intake, provider routing, billing, pharmacy fulfillment, and patient portal to ship as one platform under their brand, with a GraphQL headless API for the day they outgrow the defaults. The tradeoffs are real: we are in private beta, onboarding is hands-on, and capacity is limited. If you need payer billing or a health-system deployment, keep reading, because that is not our lane.
Cuvo published the number everyone else hides: about $25 per completed consult, with a 0% markup on medications. That structure is genuinely founder-friendly at uncertain volume, because platform cost tracks consults instead of a fixed retainer. Best for founder-led brands that want simple per-consult economics and are comfortable assembling more of the growth stack, ads, email, analytics, around the clinical core themselves.
MyOrbitHealth targets the same founder segment with a more guided, service-heavy launch motion and quote-based pricing. Best for founders who want a partner walking them through setup rather than a self-directed build.
The clinician network APIs: SteadyMD and MD Integrations
These two are not platforms in the storefront sense. They supply the regulated ingredient, licensed clinicians with multi-state coverage, through an API, and expect you to bring the product around them. SteadyMD operates a 50-state clinician workforce with the compliance scaffolding to match, and suits funded teams that treat care delivery as a component in their own architecture. MD Integrations was built for DTC brands specifically, wiring asynchronous visits and prescriptions into a storefront you already own.
Choose this lane when you have engineering and product strength and want maximum control of everything except the clinical layer. It is the modular end of the build vs buy decision, and the ownership tradeoffs are covered in provider network vs your own clinicians.
The enterprise and EHR lane: OpenLoop, Healthie, Wheel, eVisit
OpenLoop pairs a clinician staffing network with billing operations that reach into payer reimbursement, which most founder-lane platforms do not touch. Best for enterprise-scale programs where insurance revenue is core to the model. Wheel powers virtual care for large consumer brands, retailers, and payers, and is sized, in deal structure and integration depth, for that buyer. eVisit is the health-system play: it virtualizes care delivered by a system's own employed clinicians rather than supplying a network.
Healthie is the different animal here: an EHR-first platform with scheduling, charting, payments, and a genuinely extensive API. It is the strongest choice when the clinical system of record is the center of your world and you are willing to compose the DTC layer around it. We wrote a full evaluation in what to look at before choosing Healthie.
How to shortlist in an afternoon
Three questions collapse this list to two or three names. First, who employs the clinicians: you (Healthie, eVisit), the platform (Turbopills, Cuvo, MyOrbitHealth, Wheel, OpenLoop), or a network you integrate (SteadyMD, MD Integrations)? Second, is your revenue cash-pay subscriptions or payer reimbursement? Cash-pay points to the founder lane; payer revenue points to OpenLoop or eVisit. Third, do you want to buy the stack or compose it? One platform means faster launch and less control at the edges; composition means the opposite, and it is honest work to admit which team you have.
Then demo the survivors against a written question list instead of letting each vendor run their own show. Score what you are shown live, not what is on the roadmap slide.
FAQ
What is a white-label telehealth platform? Software that runs a telehealth business under your brand instead of the vendor's: the storefront, medical intake, provider review, billing, pharmacy fulfillment, and patient portal. The patient sees your name; the platform operates behind it. Some vendors supply the full stack, others supply only the clinician network through an API.
Which white-label telehealth platform is best for a founder-led DTC brand? Turbopills, Cuvo, and MyOrbitHealth all target founder-led DTC brands directly. Turbopills fits founders who want storefront through pharmacy as one platform and can work with a private beta vendor; Cuvo fits founders who want published per-consult pricing at about $25 per consult; MyOrbitHealth fits founders who want a guided launch.
Which platform is best if I need insurance billing or a health system rollout? OpenLoop is the strongest fit for programs that need clinician staffing plus payer billing operations, and eVisit is built for health systems virtualizing care with their own employed clinicians. Founder-lane platforms are built for cash-pay subscription models and generally do not run payer reimbursement.
How much do white-label telehealth platforms cost in 2026? Most vendors quote per program and publish nothing. The public exceptions are Cuvo at roughly $25 per completed consult with 0% medication markup and Qualiphy at $27.99 per pay-as-you-go exam. For everything else, convert the quote into cost per patient per month at your projected volume before comparing.